Cyclocross Magazine

Cyclocross Community, Forums, Classifieds, Photos and Videos

Has anyone tried running Michelin Jets tubeless? thanks.

Views: 140

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

What rims are you using?
Yes, running a Jet on Am Classic 440's with no problem. Have a Mich Mud on the other wheel. Both seated equally easy and no problems with burping.
Cool. I'm building a set of Stans 340s w/ DT Swiss 240s. Ive had really good luck with other Michelin tires so I would like to stick with the brand. Compared to other brands I have used, Michelins are super premium quality all the way around. So how much sealant should be used? I read 50ml is a "starting point", but what is optimum? thanks again.
I used 50ml on my first pair, think I used around 35ml on these. Race in Colorado--lots of bumpy hardpack and goathead thorns--especially on courses where I'd run the Jet. No issues so far.
Hey guys,

I too have had good luck, both as conversions with Stans strips and on Stans rims with Michelin Jet and Mud. I've typically just used 2oz - which I guess is 59+ml, and that's lasted as long as a season but was dry by then. But usually the tread is worn out before that.

Jeff, just FYI, with Stans rims you can get away more brands than with rim conversions, based on our experience documented here.

Good luck.
Thanks for that. I'm buying a couple of latex tubes just in case, but using a Stans rim I have high hopes even though the tire is not technically tubeless ready. The tires that state tubeless ready, what exactly is different about the bead? Thanks.
The bead is not so different, but the casing holds air without sealant.  Often that adds a bit of weight to the casing though, and I'd want to add sealant anyway for prophylaxis. Mich should work great with stan's rims and 2 oz of sealant! 
That crossed my mind too. If you're adding 100g of sealant you haven't really done much in terms weight considering latex tubes are pretty light. Sure you'll decrease rolling resistance, but a tube to me at least is just a little more security. Another thing, if you were to flat or burp or whatever out on a ride, what is the process as far as airing back up? What kind of spares do you carry and how easy is it to air a tubeless with a mini pump? Thanks again.
hey there. if it burps and reseals, a mini pump will be fine. compared to tubes, yes, a latex tube is similar but a good tubeless setup will be more reliable and allow you to go lower than with a latex tube and will be more puncture-free. worst case, you can just throw a tube in there and remove the valve.

the tubeless beads do have a slightly different shape and are designed to not stretch. the old hutchys had a bead inherited from road tubeless which needs to have a stretch-free bead so it won't blow off in high pressure. but that's not necessary in low pressure systems. more important is that the bead is tight.

Hutchinson has reworked the bead for this year - we just got some in. Stay tuned.
but they're still that awful gray color right (hutchinson piranhas)? on that picture on stans home page, are they saying that tire with the sidewalls touching is still inflated? so the sealant will seal that large of a gap? i thought it was mainly for nail-head sized punctures...
hi jeff, which pic are you talking about? yeah, the new hutchinsons are still gray.

This one. They say the sidewalls are touching with the bead-lock exposed and I assume they are saying its still holding air fine. If so, that's pretty amazing.


Sold something in our classifieds? Find this site valuable?

Consider a donation to the cause. We're cheaper than eBay fees, and it helps us here at CXM keep the lights on!

Enter any amount below, and click on the cow for some good karma. Thanks!




© 2024   Created by Cyclocross Magazine.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service